1. Why examiners love staging & grading
The new classification replaced the old “chronic vs aggressive” system, because it gives a clearer clinical picture and supports treatment planning.
In OSCE/viva you’re scored on:
- Choosing the right stage
- Choosing the right grade
- Giving a short justification
2. The 2-step mindset
Always answer in this order:
Exam Approach
Step 1: Stage it (severity + complexity)
Step 2: Grade it (speed + risk)
3. How to Stage periodontitis (I → IV)
Start with the WORST affected site (your maximum CAL or radiographic bone loss).
Staging (very high-yield)
- Stage I (initial): CAL 1–2 mm, bone loss limited to coronal third, PD ≤4 mm.
- Stage II (moderate): CAL 3–4 mm, bone loss coronal third, PD ≤5 mm.
- Stage III (severe): CAL ≥5 mm, bone loss to middle third, PD ≥6 mm, possible furcation.
- Stage IV (advanced): Stage III + functional problems (drifting, bite collapse, <20 teeth remaining).
After choosing I–IV, add extent: Localized (<30% teeth), Generalized (≥30%), or molar-incisor pattern.
4. Complexity factors that push Stage III/IV
Even if CAL is borderline, complexity can upgrade the stage. Examiners expect this line.
- PD ≥6 mm
- Vertical bone loss ≥3 mm
- Furcation class II/III
- Tooth loss because of periodontitis
- Less than 20 remaining teeth = automatic Stage IV
These “upgrade clues” are emphasized in clinical decision trees.
5. How to Grade periodontitis (A → C)
Grading estimates progression and future risk. If you have old radiographs, compare them; if not, use bone loss/age ratio.
Grading (simple rules)
- Grade A (slow): bone loss/age <0.25, heavy plaque but little destruction.
- Grade B (moderate): bone loss/age 0.25–1.0, expected progression.
- Grade C (rapid): bone loss/age >1.0, destruction out of proportion to plaque.
6. Risk modifiers that upgrade Grade
You pick a grade, then modify based on risk:
- Smoking: <10 cigarettes/day → at least Grade B; ≥10/day → Grade C.
- Diabetes: HbA1c <7% → at least Grade B; ≥7% → Grade C.
7. OSCE / Viva model answer
Example Examiner Answer
“This patient has maximum CAL of 5–6 mm with radiographic bone loss into the middle third and a class II furcation, so I would diagnose Stage III periodontitis. Bone loss/age ratio is around 0.6 with no heavy risk modifiers, so this is Grade B. Extent is generalized because more than 30% of teeth are involved.”
8. Common student mistakes
- Staging based on average CAL instead of maximum site
- Ignoring complexity upgrades
- Forgetting extent (localized vs generalized)
- Grading without checking smoking/diabetes
9. How DentAIstudy helps
DentAIstudy can instantly transform perio charts into:
- Stage + grade diagnosis
- Justified OSCE summaries
- Flashcards for rules and risk modifiers
- MCQs for boards
References
- Tonetti MS, Greenwell H, Kornman KS. Staging and grading of periodontitis: framework and proposal. J Periodontol. 2018.
- American Academy of Periodontology / European Federation of Periodontology. Staging and Grading Periodontitis guideline summary. 2019.
- EFP Clinical decision tree for staging and grading. 2019.
- ADA overview of 2017 World Workshop classification. 2022.